Re: -fno-omit-frame-pointer does not work as advertised

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Daan De Meyer via devel wrote:
>> What about the new SFrame unwind info?
> 
> We're closely following up on this new format and will compare it against
> frame pointers if a patch introducing a kernel unwinder for sframe is
> proposed and likely to be merged. It's still very early days for SFrame
> though so we'll have to see what happens first.

Then why are we now rushing to use that frame pointer hack on F38 (and 
rebuilding the entire distro with it right now), instead of waiting one 
release or two for the proper solution?

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux