On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 2:28 PM Till Hofmann <thofmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi all, > > Someone (rightfully) suggested that we should build glfw twice, once > with wayland support and once without: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152319 > > Is there any best practice how to build the same package in two > different flavors, in this case cmake-based? I vaguely remember seeing a > spec file that did that, but I don't remember where. > > Thanks for any pointers! > > Kind regards, > Till I don't know about best practices, but it seems like you could do something like this: %build %cmake <first set of options> %cmake_build mv %{_vpath_builddir} build-first %cmake <second set of options> %cmake_build mv %{_vpath_builddir} build-second %install mv build-first %{_vpath_builddir} %cmake_install mv %{_vpath_builddir} build-first mv build-second %{_vpath_builddir} %cmake_install mv %{_vpath_builddir} build-second %check mv build-first %{_vpath_builddir} %ctest mv %{_vpath_builddir} build-first mv build-second %{_vpath_builddir} %ctest mv %{_vpath_builddir} build-second I made that up off the top of my head and haven't tried it, so it may have some fatal flaw. Take with a large grain of salt. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
