Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11. 01. 23 17:52, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
Il 11/01/23 13:58, Miro Hrončok ha scritto:
sigul                                            kevin, mitr

Retiring this would blow up Fedora infrastructure... the FTB/FTI is
being worked on, but it depends on python-nss to be un-retired and the
package review for that is in progress (just approved a few days ago).

Can you just remove it from the list to stay on the safe side?

Retiring it from rawhide would not change anything in the infrastructure at all considering the package does not currently even install.

I trust it will be fixed in time, I am watching the nss review request (it has been approved).

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux