On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 7:22 AM Neal Becker <ndbecker2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The one concern I have with this proposal is it says that flatpak version would only be offered if it didn't duplicate a package in fedora. The potential problem I see is this depends on Fedora and Flathub being totally consistent in their naming. Flatpaks require RDNN naming (because AppStream does), which is often part of the upstream source code already for AppStream data. So this is *usually* not an issue. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
