On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 11:48 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10. 01. 23 13:52, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Second, how exactly are you building the package?
> Looking at [1], you used "Source Type: SRPM or .spec file upload".
> How was it generated?
>
> [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hobbes1069/OIIO/build/5210045/
> <https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hobbes1069/OIIO/build/5210045/>
>
> Both 'fedpkg srpm' and uploading that to copr, and letting copr build from
> dist-git should result in the expected release. (Though without other steps
> it'll still be the same as the version in Fedora release, so you'll need
> to tell dnf to install that specific build.)
>
>
> Looks like the problem is using `rpkg` but that's the easiest method and has
> worked great until now...
For the record I've reported several issues with the rpkg method over the
years. The distgit method was partially a response for those. tl;dr rpkg "works
great" until it doesn't because it does not work like fedpkg, but instead it is
a pre-processor for templated spec files that happens to work in most of the
cases with bare spec files as well.
I didn't realize the fedpkg had grown the ability to do COPR builds. I will use that from now on.
Thanks,
Richard
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
