On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 04:53:47PM +0100, Jiri Konecny wrote: > Hi all, > > > == Benefit to Fedora == > > * Better secure boot support (specifically the initrd is covered by > > the signature). > > * Better confidential computing support (measurements are much more > > useful if we know what hashes to expect for the initrd). > > * More robust boot process (generating the initrd on the installed > > system is fragile, root cause for kernel bugs reported is simply a > > broken initrd sometimes). > Just want to add Anaconda installation environment is also fighting with the > second point. Third point I assume, i.e. initrd generation problems being reported as anaconda bugs? While being at it: anaconda seems to explicitly call dracut to generate the initrd (according to the messages it prints). What is the reason for this? Shouldn't this already happen as part of the rpm transaction, when the kernel install scripts are running? > Thanks to the PXE boot it's maybe even more fragile > environment. Yep. I'd highly recommend to use uefi http boot whenever possible. Note that uefi http boot can also work with iso images, i.e. you can have the dhcp server hand out URLs to the fedora netboot iso. The firmware will fetch the iso, create a ramdisk, add a acpi table for it so the OS finds it too, then go boot as it would be a physical cdrom all the way up to anaconda. BTW: Having some way other than the kernel command line to pass config options to anaconda would make this much more useful. take care, Gerd _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
