> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 12:42:38PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Different architectures have different boot loaders. In particular, s390x and > ppc64el are very different. The proposal is to add support for UKIs in grub2, so > that we will cover UEFI and non-UEFI machines that use grub2. For other > architectures, we can in principle do the same thing… After all, the UKI is just > a binary with a few sections appended. But it seems to early to think such > details far ahead. As extensively discussed, the support for separate initrds is > not going anyway and the proposal only targets a small subset of the amd64 space. Also, doesn't u-boot support those architectures? The latest u-boot UEFI interface seems to work quite well when I tried, including support for secure boot. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
