On Mi, 21.12.22 06:27, Neal Gompa (ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 6:23 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 20/12/2022 19:56, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > Great. The gotcha though is this in effect requires a change in the file system currently mounted at /boot, which is ext4. And ext4 isn't supported by sd-boot or UEFI firmware. So if you're going to support sd-boot, the installer needs to be aware that either the ESP is big enough to be used as /boot, or if it's not big enough then it will be mounted on /efi*and* a new partition XBOOTLDR formatted as FAT will be used as /boot. > > > > Nobody should use FAT for /boot. efifs[1] should be used instead. > > > > systemd-boot can load these drivers from ESP out of the box[2]. > > > > [1]: https://github.com/pbatard/efifs > > [2]: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/15617 > > Indeed. We should not endeavor to create more problems by putting more > stuff in the ESP. By doing so, we lose features and capabilities from > our own native filesystem. No matter what boot manager we use, we > should not be required to give that up. We already have efifs[1] > packaged in Fedora, let's use that. That's such a weird logic. /boot is supposed to contain data consumed by the boot loader, not so much by the OS. What do you think a boot laoder is going to do with access modes, file ownership, selinux labels? I am pretty sure we should reduce problems and simplify things by just using VFAT for boot loader stuff, and put everything at the least number of places possible. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue