Hi, > With my FESCo hat on, I immediately have the following comment: > please narrow down the scope to things that we can actually approve > for F38. E.g. the parts related to replacing grub2 by sd-boot > are IMHO not realistic for F38 (*). sd-boot actually replacing grub2 in anaconda installs or cloud images: Yes, that is unrealistic. Building images which use sd-boot with a custom kickstart file (doing 'bootctl install' in %post): That works already. > And if we use grub2, then also the > pre-calculation of TPM PCR values is not realistic, since they are > too volatile with grub2... I think that those are all very interesting > research tangents, but the stuff that gets a stamp of approval as a > Fedora Change needs to be down-to-earth and users-know-what-to-expect > and you-can-pretty-much-figure-out-how-things-will-look-from-the-change-description. Suggestions how to deal with those best? The reason this stuff is in there is that I want also outline the longer-term goal behind this. I could create a "Phase 2" change page and move over stuff ... thanks & take care, Gerd _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
