Re: 4KSTACKS et al...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 09:22:55AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
 > I also find it hard to understand why it is such a problem having a larger 
 > stack. As you point out, as software evolves it ultimately becomes more 
 > complex. If the developers design needs it and the software is reliable 
 > and efficient (aka performs well) then why not.
 > 
 > A quick caclulation.
 > 
 > 2000*4k is about 8M in say 1G at least.
 > 
 > Not a large percentage overhead I think.

Now try finding 2000 _contiguous_ pairs of pages after the machine
has been up for a while, under load.  Memory fragmentation makes
this a really nasty problem, and the VM eats its own head after
repeatedly scanning every page in the system.

		Dave

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux