Re: Fedora Internationalization: Hacked by Chinese?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> The decision was made in the context of rhl and rhel when fedora
> wasn't even a glimmer in anyone's beer yet. So how about you look at
> the decision to pull the flags and the decision to make the bug report
> private in the correct context for the timeframe when those original
> decisions were made...before this was a community project.

Well, if a new bug was closed as a dupe of an old (private) bug, it
pulls the old bug up to the present, implying it is relevant to Fedora
(but we can't see because it is a private bug).

It would be nice if public bugs were not closed as dupes of private bugs
(except for security bugs that should only be private for a short time).
If RH wants to do that for RHEL, that is their business, but I'd say it
is a bad idea for Fedora.

-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux