Re: Small rant: installer environment size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 19:59 +0100, drago01 wrote:
> On Thursday, December 8, 2022, Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 12:58 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > 
> > > I've done a few passes, dropping a bunch of older firmware upstream
> > > that are no longer supported in any stable kernel release, also a
> > > bunch of de-dupe and linking of files rather than shipping of multiple
> > > copies of the same firmware. It's improved things a bit, unfortunately
> > > a lot of the dead firmware was tiny compared to say average modern
> > > devices like GPUs or WiFI.
> > > 
> > > The problem with a lot of the firmware, and with the new nvidia "open
> > > driver" which shoves a lot of stuff into firmware in order to have an
> > > upstreamable driver apparently the firmwares there are going to be
> > > 30+Mb each, is that they're needed to bring up graphics/network etc to
> > > even just install so I don't know how we can get around this and still
> > > have a device work enough to be able to install the needed firmware
> > > across the network.
> > > 
> > > Ideas on how to solve that problem welcome.
> > 
> > Sorry if this is way off, but - do we need the GPU firmwares to run a
> > graphical install on the fallback path, just using the framebuffer set
> > up by the firmware? How crazy would it be to just do that - ship the
> > installer env with no GPU firmware?
> 
> 
> That would be very crazy, as you will have a degraded user experience
> (laggy UI, wrong resolution, ...) to save a couple of megabytes that are a
> non issue for today's hardware.

I mean, the modern systems that *need* GPU firmware generally seem to
do pretty well with using native resolution and don't perform too
badly, especially in the simple installer UI. When I test the fallback
path on my bare metal test box on UEFI it uses the monitor's native
resolution and performs fine (even, honestly, in GNOME), and that
motherboard is nearly a decade old even. Don't know if this is the same
for everyone, of course.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux