Re: F38 proposal: Add _FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 to distribution build flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 3:15 PM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 12:56 PM Andrii Nakryiko
> > <andrii.nakryiko(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
> >
> > I don't think the two are comparable at all, neither in terms of
> > potential performance impact (register pressure across an entire
> > program vs at specific API call points in some unique cases) nor in
> > terms of the benefits it provides.
>
> It's irrelevant if they are comparable. This is a system-wide change that has potential to cause performance regression. By how much -- not clear. Hand-waiving such concerns is extremely disappointing in the face of the scrutiny given to https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2817. So, please get inspiration from that proposal and do benchmarks.
>

You're basically making a political statement, so I'll just leave that
bit for FESCO to deal with.

Thanks,
Sid
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux