On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 10:53 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It has a similar impact that turning back on frame pointers would. > > Cf. https://developers.redhat.com/articles/2022/09/17/gccs-new-fortification-level#the_gains_of_improved_security_coverage_outweigh_the_cost > That article explicitly states: "We need a proper study of performance and code size to understand the magnitude of the impact" I look forward to seeing the results of that proper study before this is even considered for approval (since, after all, one of the strong push-backs for -fno-omit-frame-pointer was performance). _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
