Re: Some reasons I really dislike buildroot overrides and would like us to get rid of them soon

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/12/2022 22:30, Adam Williamson wrote:
1. Packages that have been pushed stable since the last time a compose
succeeded (for Rawhide that's a Rawhide compose, for Branched it's a
Branched compose, for stable releases it's an updates compose)
2. Packages that have active buildroot overrides

I use buildroot overrides because generating side tags for stable releases of Fedora is a very slow process.

Two days ago I created F36, F37 and F38 side tags. F38 side tag was ready in 10 minutes, and F36+F37 wasn't generated even after 6 hours. That's why I created a new buildroot override and built everything directly.

Before disabling buildroot overrides this issue must be fixed. Waiting for 6+ hours is unacceptable.

Also I think we should limit the existing side tags for 1 week. After this date they should be removed automatically.

--
Sincerely,
  Vitaly Zaitsev (vitaly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux