On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 04:27:16PM -0700, Dave Roberts wrote: > On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 19:46 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > . That it, they seem independent, but most of the > > > documentation on exec-shield I have seen seems to suggest that turning > > > off exec-shield should turn off just about everything and leave you with > > > a pretty standard system, ala the pre-exec-shield days. Is that no > > > longer true? > > > > well.. randomisation is now merged upstream.... > > I'm not sure I understand. So that means "yes, they are now > independent" ? > > So assuming that's the case, what does the kernel look for in > determining whether to turn of randomization on a per-binary basis? Nowhere.. it's on for everything. The theory is that randomisation doesn't do anything "odd" at all that couldn't happen otherwise. (by for example upgrading a few libraries or so) So I'd like to get to the bottom of why this app is breaking -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
