Re: [INPUT REQUESTED] Re: F38 proposal: Node.js Repackaging (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I have now submitted
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2150093 and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2150094 for the
`nodejs16` and `nodejs18` packages for Fedora.

You can test them with `dnf copr enable sgallagh/nodejs-alternatives`.

The final approach I took is one that follows the example of Python3.
The SRPM is versioned according to the major release number and the
output binary RPMs will be `nodejs[-*]` if it is the default version
for that release or `nodejs$MAJOR[-*]` if not.

I've tested the upgrade path from F36 and F37 and it appears to work
fine (and could, in fact, trivially be backported to the live releases
to simplify maintenance).

I'd appreciate package reviews from anyone with the available time. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux