On 30. 11. 22 19:07, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The list of the packages which use MODULE_COMPAT and do not contain Perl
directories are here [1].
[1] https://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/perl-module-compat/only-compat-no-dirs
Thanks, I will have a look.
noarch packages would only require perl-libs instead of perl(:MODULE_COMPAT...)
with %perl_require_compat. I've checked all noarch packages from the list: they
already require /usr/bin/perl (which requires perl-libs and
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT...)).
The only exception is EekBoek which already requires perl-interpreter manually
anyway (it also requires perl-generators which I don't understand).
The arched packages from the list are a bit more complex than that.
Some of them require libperl.so.5.36()(64bit) which is probably good enough.
Some of them don't require perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.36.0) or anything perl-ish
based on my query (e.g. asterisk, claws-mail or zypper) -- maybe I need to
query a specific subpackge instead?
Some fo them require /usr/bin/perl and I think would not need to require
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.36.0) even when not noarch. My (unverified) assumption is
that the packages contains compiled executables, but no Perl modules. They
probably only contain Perl script (e.g. docbook2X, emacspeak or freeradius).
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
