On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 10:44 AM Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't see anything depending on it in the RPM specs file archive.
It looks like the configure script might get confused when building with
future C compilers which do not accept implicit function declarations,
and it's probably not worth porting this to C99.
According to my repoquery, erlang-js still uses mozjs68:
$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires mozjs68 --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide
Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next Fedora release 36 kB/s | 10 kB 00:00
Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next Fedora release 23 MB/s | 64 MB 00:02
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:13 ago on Tue 29 Nov 2022 11:18:22 AM CET.
erlang-js-0:1.9.2-6.fc37.x86_64
mozjs68-devel-0:68.12.0-8.fc37.i686
mozjs68-devel-0:68.12.0-8.fc37.x86_64
Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next Fedora release 36 kB/s | 10 kB 00:00
Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next Fedora release 23 MB/s | 64 MB 00:02
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:13 ago on Tue 29 Nov 2022 11:18:22 AM CET.
erlang-js-0:1.9.2-6.fc37.x86_64
mozjs68-devel-0:68.12.0-8.fc37.i686
mozjs68-devel-0:68.12.0-8.fc37.x86_64
When it is time to retire mozjs68 (apparently not yet because of erlang-js, but hopefully soon :) ), please add mozjs68 to fedora-obsolete-packages because a lot of users probably still have it installed and it is going to get broken deps and break the update path as soon as icu gets updated in rawhide.
--
Kalev
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue