I guess there's (at least) two ways to understand "stable": - things don't break - things don't change (... unless absolutely necessary, in each case) To me, "things don't break" describes Fedora stable releases (as opposed to rawhide), and "things don't change" describes RHEL. A typical Fedora user wants the latest if it works and should be prepared to adjust to the changes this brings with it (but not to rawhide-type breakage). A typical RHEL user wants a stable environment for reproducible computing (short of containerizing and freezing for reproducibility). On a side-note: This is why Fedora packagers are sometimes hesitant to build for EPEL because it means going by a different notion of "stable". _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
