On Sun, 2022-11-20 at 19:24 -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > On 11/20/22 17:40, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Sun, 2022-11-20 at 17:22 -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > > On 11/20/22 07:24, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote: > > > > Now that nss 3.85 has been built, I thought I'd have a go at building > > > > FF 107.0, given that's been out for a few days and original builds > > > > failed in koji, because nss was too old at the time. > > > > > > Has switching to bundled NSS been considered? For browsers anything > > > that holds up an update is very, *very* bad. > > > > Casually handling crypto libraries is very, *very* worse. > > Has there ever been a case where Fedora’s NSS was not vulnerable to > something that the bundled NSS was vulnerable to? To be clear, I am > referring to the NSS shipped by Mozilla as a part of Firefox. > Another option would be to ensure that NSS is promptly updated. NSS is generally updated in order to release Firefox, I am not aware of a chronic issue here. We compile NSS differently than what Mozilla does, for example we use the Fedora OS trust anchors, and the Fedora Crypto-Policies, etc.. it is not just about vulnerabilities, system integration matters too. But we *have* released patches for security vulnerabilities in NSS w/o requiring also a full recompile and retesting of Firefox. Simo. -- Simo Sorce RHEL Crypto Team Red Hat, Inc _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
