> what is the impact of the proposed change on non-x86 platforms? I
> assume the proposal focuses on x86, but the distro wide flags are shared
> across all platforms in Fedora, it means aarch64, ppc64le and s390x.
> With RISC-V waiting behind the door ...
None, because this proposal is not going to be implemented.
AFAIK none, but not for that reason: it seems to already be implemented and part of the aarch64 abi. It would be helpfulmfornthe change request to confirm this.
For the python code, also none because it will also be implemented as default via upstream in python 3.12 and thus coming to fedora even without this change request.
So the situation will be that the slowest mainstream arch and the slowest mainstream code on all arches will have frame pointers enabled, but not on the fastest arch for the fastest code.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
