Re: hackrf package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I just upgraded my system to Fedora 37 and noticed that the package "hackrf" was
> still from Fedora 36.  I found a failed build from the f37-rebuild, dated 2022-07-21 [1]. 
> It apparently failed on aarch64, but the logs are long gone - at least I don't see
> them on koji.
> 
> I tried a scratch build, and it went fine [2].
> 
> What is the correct procedure to request a rebuild for situations like this?  Should I ask
> the maintainers, or file an infra ticket, or ...?
> 
> 	Steve
> 
> [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=89804049
> [2] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=94253032

There's already an open bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2113439

You might want to follow-up on that bug, or perhaps initiate a non-responsive maintainer process, if the maintainer continues to not respond.

Scott
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux