On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 4:18 AM Sandro <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 11-11-2022 10:12, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 4:10 AM Sandro <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> On 08-11-2022 15:06, David Cantrell wrote: > >>> On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 09:45:57AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >>>> Should new package reviews (for Rawhide) now be rejected if they > >>>> don't have SPDX tags? > >>> > >>> Yes, new packages going forward should use SPDX expressions in the > >>> License tag. > >> > >> When will rpmlint be updated to correctly recognize SPDX license tags? I > >> don't see it as part of the change proposal. > >> > >> Right now it throws a warning, e.g.: W: invalid-license GPL-3.0-only. > > > > Does it go away when you install rpmlint-fedora-license-data? > > It does. Thanks for the pointer. So, I guess rpmlint should depend on it? > I will add a Recommends to it. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
