On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 2:52 PM Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Dne 09. 11. 22 v 13:58 Neal Gompa napsal(a): > > What do we do if the SPDX tag is the same as the existing license > tag (eg ISC) though? Do we just add a dummy change/commit entry that > mentions SPDX to confirm we've reviewed it? > > Don't bother. Eventually, we'll re-process all spec files and identify > what to do next anyway. > > Actually... if you add there the dummy changelog entry, it makes my work easier. Which data source are you using to check changelog contents? For packages that use rpmautospec, you'll need to check changelog contents in the SRPM, not the unprocessed spec file. And if you're querying changelogs from RPMs or SRPMs, adding a dummy changelog entry also won't do anything unless a new build is done in either case. Also note that for Rust packages, conversion to SPDX has been an ongoing process since rust2rpm made SPDX expressions the default with version 22, and the conversion itself was usually just a side product of updating packages to a newer version, and in these cases, the changelog doesn't mention SPDX at all. If you want to include Rust packages which have switched to SPDX in your analysis, you can grep spec files for the string "# Generated by rust2rpm 22" or "# Generated by rust2rpm 23" (since spec files generated by rust2rpm v22+ use SPDX). Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
