On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 06:53:46PM +0000, Naheem Zaffar wrote: > Has there been any consideration to turn on frame pointers for atleast dev > releases? > > AFAIK the kernel already has a separate configuration during the > development phase of the distro-cycle This practice already causes problems for people trying to use rawhide because the debug config options massively slowdown the rawhide kernel resulting in timeouts for various test/build processes: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/HRJT4UF35MRJ7C4ZXVHBFXB4BTW64YSO/#ZPU2TZ72D5SP7I4AVTBV2NXXBEBQ7HD6 > Can this be extended for rebuilds of alpha and beta releases in rawhide to > turn on frame pointers as an interim solution until everything else is > figured out? IMHO if something isn't good enough for release, we shouldn't put it in rawhide either, as it undermines the usability of rawhide. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
