On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 22:38 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le mercredi 27 juillet 2005 à 16:18 -0400, Owen Taylor a écrit : > > On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 19:28 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > Le samedi 23 juillet 2005 à 22:15 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : > > > > Le samedi 23 juillet 2005 à 19:42 +0000, Mike Chambers a écrit : > > > > > With a fully updated FC4 + full rawhide updates, are the fonts still as > > > > > messed up as they have been recently, especially in evolution and > > > > > firefox (even with the alpha one?)? > > > > > > > > Fonts are still messed a bit in Firefox (size). No complaints with Evo. > > > > > > Well with fontconfig-2.3.2-1 OTOH rendering changed drastically > > > > How? > > > > I expect no changes from that. > > > > On the other hand, once we get the next set of Cairo/Pango/GTK+ changes > > into the tree, rendering *will* change drastically ... in theory, > > it will be identical to FC4 at that point. > > Lines seem thinner, character spacing is degraded (some of them touch > when they didn't before). I'm sorry I can't be more specific, my eyes > are adapting and I don't have a pre-update control system to compare (so > I must try to remember a pre-yesterday system) but the changes were very > noticeable just after the rawhide sync. At least in evo, so maybe it's > evo-specific, but I seem to remember the Gnome panel changing too. I don't think this is a change with the fontconfig upgrade, but it is the versus-FC4 delta that the next batch of upgrades should fix. Regards, Owen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
