Re: FontAwesome 6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 1:37 AM Matthias Runge <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As a former contributor to those packages, your assumption is correct.
> python-XStatic-Font-Awesome can go away; I'll sync with Radomir on that
> note.

Great!  One less package for me to worry about. :-)

> If someone relies on fontawesome-fonts, they should step up. The
> question is, how to get out of this, since there were incompatible
> changes between major package releases. Three options:

I'm working on option 4: migrate all users to version 6.  I have to
admit that the packages that consume fontawesome through a web
interface (I'm looking at you, freeipa and ipsilon) are proving
somewhat troublesome.  I am not a web developer, nor do I play one on
TV.  I'll muddle through it eventually, but would welcome help from
any actual web developers with (cough, cough) free time.

Thanks for the reply.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux