On Mon, Oct 24, 2022, at 11:45 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > There are a lot of things going on in this proposal: > > - shipping editions as container images in quay https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11047 > - migrating existing users to the new container image based updates (No tracker yet) > - overriding yum/dnf commands via cliwrap https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/issues/2883 > - rebranding `rpm-ostree` https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/issues/405 > > I feel like we'd have a more cohesive discussion if we tried to break this up > into smaller pieces so we can have a more focused discussion. These links were already mostly in the proposal, but I've added them again here for convenience. > As written this proposal is hard to swallow. Two things: - This proposal is explicitly trying to tie everything together. I think without the "bigger picture", it's actually *more* confusing. For example, just pushing the container images does little unless we invest in them as a derivation source and build tooling and docs around them. - At a very practical level, I find context switching in Mediawiki syntax to be rather tedious. I'd prefer to discuss the individual sections in the already extant tracker issues that accept Markdown and have a well-understood and used discussion mechanism. (Or of course, email here) But you're certainly not wrong, it *is* a big proposal. Happy to make changes, I'm mainly just saying there already are dedicated sub-proposal trackers to discuss the details of those. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
