Il 12/10/22 12:28, Vít Ondruch ha scritto: > So since I don't think the DNF5 name and especially the package name was > elaborated here and my wish in package review to have the package name > just `dnf` was completely ignored [1], I'll ask here. > > Why `dnf5` and not `dnf` version 5. If it is not DNF and it needs > different name, then please rather name it `foobar`. I think that > introducing the version into name is wrong (with exception of compat > packages) and I think that DNF should lead by example and not abusing > the package name for version. > > > Vít > > My guess is that dnf5 is an entirely different beast than dnf. dnf was written in python, dnf5 is written in C (?), so it's not just a major version upgrade. Mattia _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
