Dne 12. 10. 22 v 12:28 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
So since I don't think the DNF5 name and especially the package name was elaborated here and my wish in package review
to have the package name just `dnf` was completely ignored [1], I'll ask here.
Why `dnf5` and not `dnf` version 5. If it is not DNF and it needs different name, then please rather name it `foobar`.
I think that introducing the version into name is wrong (with exception of compat packages) and I think that DNF
should lead by example and not abusing the package name for version.
My opinion is that it should not be packaged as "dnf" until it is ready to fully replace DNFv4. And that will take some
time. I think it is fine to introduce it now in Fedora as "dnf5" package. And later rename it to "dnf".
Miroslav
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
