Re: rpmlint %forgeautosetup support (was: Re: F38 Proposal: SPDX License Phase 1 (Self-Contained Change proposal))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Todd,

> Sergey Mende wrote:
> 
> Ahh, that affects spec files which use %forgeautosetup and
> have patches, right?  They get `patch-not-applied` warnings.
> 
> It may be worth asking upstream.  Such a trivial adjustment¹
> to the regex might be acceptable.  If not, perhaps they'll
> have a good idea for how to best override that downstream.
Yes, exactly. Thanks for the hint with a config option: I hope upstream would accept such change as it does not affect over rpmlint users. I will prepare PR and submit. Let's see.

Regards,
Sergey
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux