Re: Mesa in F37- vaapi support disabled for h264/h265/vc1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nope the _video.so files are the vaapi ones.

Replacing that package with rpmfusion built should work fine.

On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 10:26 AM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 1:46 AM David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 4:30 PM Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Le mar. 27 sept. 2022 à 20:57, David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 4:02 AM Frantisek Zatloukal <fzatlouk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > since this mesa change ( https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mesa/c/94ef544b3f2125912dfbff4c6ef373fe49806b52?branch=rawhide ) in F37 and rawhide, the mesa package lost support for vaapi accelerated encoding and decoding of h264, h265 and decoding of vc1 ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123998 ).
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems like a big regression from F36 for users with GPUs with open source drivers (mainly AMD, maybe nVidia/other non x86...), that affects common use-cases of Fedora Workstation, like watching videos, in-house game streaming, attending online meetings and many more.
> > > >
> > > > This was an oversight being enabled prior to this, and I think we have
> > > > to remove it from older Fedora as well. Fedora cannot ship anything
> > > > that causes the OS to provide an API which exposes patent algorithms.
> > > >
> > > > The patent licensing around H264/H265 is such that providing this
> > > > could leave Red Hat and other Fedora distributors exposed to legal
> > > > problems.
> > > > Dave.
> > > >
> > > > > I'd like to ask:
> > > > > - Can somebody elaborate on reasons to change something that was working in Fedora for some time already?
> > > > > - Is there any short/mid/long term plan to improve the situation?
> > > > > - Would it be possible to provide vaapi support at least as an rpmfusion addon to alleviate the fallout in the short term?
> > > >
> > > > The last might be possible, but I'm not sure how to go about it.
> > > At least I've asked in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123998#c8
> > >
> > > That the fedora mesa package completely drops the vaapi backend, so a
> > > complementary package can just drop the missing files instead of
> > > rebuilding a whole mesa package.
> > > It would assume the fedora mesa package to have everything needed in
> > > order to cope with vaapi backend enabled in the core libraries and
> > > that the vaapi backend only provide the implementation.
> >
> > Please take a look at the rawhide changes I just pushed. This should
> > split things out sufficiently.
> >
>
> But wait, aren't these the DRI drivers[1]?
>
> [1]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mesa/c/07e1e0b1628d9c55d3858c4655409768c5c0b5de?branch=rawhide
>
>
>
> --
> 真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux