On Wed, 2022-09-21 at 02:53 +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Tommy Nguyen wrote: > > DNF5 is ridiculously fast. > > It is faster, but "ridiculously"? In the metric that matters (elapsed > wallclock time), your benchmark shows the update taking 30% less > time. > > That said, there are other features of DNF5 (no more Python, shared > cache > between PackageKit and CLI) that are IMHO even more interesting than > the raw > speed gain. Would you have preferred if I used a different superlative? I still consider 30% less to be significant, especially because DNF5 processes metadata in parallel which makes things seem faster, whether perceived or real. And yes, the other improvements are good as well, but end users focus on speed. See: constant discussions about how to make DNF4 faster (including enabling fastestmirror which can make things slower) or perception that it is slower because it processes metadata at a different stage than apt for example. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
