On Tue, 2022-09-20 at 11:48 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: > > An additional topic is having boot entries for Windows (and macOS) that don't work in the meantime. While we could just remove the scripts that create these entries to chainload another bootloader, they're still needed for BIOS systems which don't support bootnext. > > But not all Windows chainload boots will fail. It's not even all that > easy to tell which Windows installs will or won't work... the presence > of Bitlocker is not a 100% sign even (it could be an unlocked Bitlocker > install, which doesn't get the TPM measure and fail from grub). yeah, on the whole I'd prefer to leave it if we can't accurately decide when to include it. Note the rewritten criteria is OK with either. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
