Re: F38 proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 2/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2022-09-17 at 10:40 +0300, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
> Leigh Scott kirjoitti 17.9.2022 klo 10.27:
> > > On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 22:42 +0300, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
> > > 
> > > I found this:
> > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6410#c1
> > > 
> > > Again, not a very friendly response. The short is that they are
> > > currently in freeze so no action can be taken ATM.
> 
> I did not write that, Tommy did. Please be careful with attribution, 
> especially with clips that can be interpreted as negative.
> 
> Other than that, great to see somebody from RPM Fusion involved in
> this 

It was almost certainly a typo when editing the replies. I doubt they
intended to misquote.

Anyway, I did successfully update to the F37 beta with the crypto
policies at default. I have not tested re-enabling it because one
package I depend on still has sha1 code.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux