Hi, On September 16, 2022 5:03:03 PM UTC, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 10:03:35AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Isn't peer review much better and easier solution over all? We could also >> require signed commits I guess. > >I think it would slow things down quite a lot to require peer review of >every commit. It would a bit, but it is doable. openSUSE tumbleweed works like that: every commit that is sent into the rolling distro is reviewed by the release managers. It adds some overhead and it would most certainly require dedicated reviewers and additional tooling. >I'd personally like to avoid anything where we need to support gpg. >It's a mess and I think it would waste a lot of cycles explaining how to >use it or help people get setup. ;( If there's some easier/more clear >way to sign things that could be a option tho. > >kevin _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
