Aside: Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 15 Sep 2022 11:57:53 -0700
Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> We have "critical path" groups for lots of desktops, including ones
> that aren't release-blocking: deepin, lxde, lxqt, and xfce. The logic
> here is approximately: things that are critical to those desktops are
> indeed critical to users of those desktops, and don't affect anybody
> else. So it makes sense to put them on the "critical path", because to
> the relatively small subset of users who *do* use those desktops, the
> updates really *are* critical, and it doesn't hurt users of any other
> desktop for them to be held up.

This sounds a lot more like critical set or critical graph (as in
node-edge) than critical path.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux