Re: nodejs-electron

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Resuming this thread as the podman and podman-desktop teams are
looking to get podman-desktop packaged in Fedora
But it's unlikely either team would be able to own the nodejs-electron dep.

Would the nodejs sig and/or fedora desktop team and/or chromium
maintainers be willing to package and own nodejs-electron?

There's an open github issue pointing to this thread but that may not
get enough Fedora eyes so I'm
checking back here. (See:
https://github.com/containers/podman-desktop/issues/112)

On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 3:38 PM Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2022-03-27 at 14:52 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 2:42 PM Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 2022-02-27 at 17:15 +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, 27 February 2022 10:06:17 CET Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > On 27/02/2022 08:23, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > You don't have to. You can point electron builder to your
> > > > > > system
> > > > > > electron
> > > > > > and
> > > >  it will use that. Then you just do not package the electron files.
> > > > > > All you need is the resources directory.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > You must run electron-builder on Fedora Koji. Pre-built packages
> > > > > are
> > > > > not
> > > > > allowed.
> > > >
> > > > You should not package electron at all with your package! You
> > > > should
> > > > use the
> > > > nodejs-electron in the distribution and just point it to the
> > > > sources to
> > > > load:
> > > >
> > > > cat <<EOF >%{buildroot}%{_bindir}/signal-desktop
> > > > #!/bin/sh
> > > > export NODE_ENV=production
> > > >
> > > > exec %{_bindir}/electron %{_libdir}/%{name}/resources/app.asar
> > > > "\$@"
> > > > EOF
> > > > chmod +x %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/signal-desktop
> > >
> > > I started build electron on copr [1]
> > >
> > > I built ffmpeg , nodejs-electron, element-web and element-desktop
> > > for
> > > Fedora 34 and 35 successfully element-web fails on F36+
> > >
> > > I rebuilt ffmpeg-free from Fedora to F35 and F34
> > > after I used
> > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/network:im:signal/nodejs-electron
> > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/devel:languages:javascript/element-web
> > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:sergiomb/element-desktop
> > >
> > >
> > > build on electron took 11 hours on x64 and 15 hours in aarch , is
> > > almost a build o chromium , which make me wonder if we can't use a
> > > chromium as a library
> > > https://www.electronjs.org/blog/electron-internals-building-chromium-as-a-library
> > >
> >
> > libchromiumcontent hasn't been a thing in a *very* long time. It was
> > merged into Electron in Electron 4.0 (which was years ago!) and it's
> > all built as one runtime environment binary.
> >
> > But, one thing that could be done to simplify things would be to ship
> > a chromium-src-devel package in the chromium package that electron
> > could pull in. That would tightly couple the chromium and electron
> > packages, but it would mean that improvements we make to the chromium
> > package would be easily consumed by electron...
> >
>
> yes, I think that should be the path and and I'd love see that done ,
> also for other projects like nwjs (node-webkit)
> https://github.com/nwjs/nw.js , doesn't make sense to me build chromium
> all the times , mainly because chromium takes hours and hours to build
> and consumes a lot and a lot of resources.
>
> > I'm not sure we *want* to do that, but I have seen that done before
> > for Electron packaging...
> >
> >
> > --
> > 真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
> --
> Sérgio M. B.
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure



-- 
Lokesh
Libera, GitLab, GitHub, Fedora: lsm5
Matrix: @lsm5:lsm5.ems.host
GPG: 0xC7C3A0DD
https://keybase.io/lsm5
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux