Dne 09. 09. 22 v 17:09 Maxwell G via devel napsal(a):
On Friday, September 9, 2022 Vít Ondruch wrote:However, I think that the idea is that whatever should be said about the CVE should be said in the main tracer. The fedora tracker should be used just to not forget to fix this in Fedora.Why not both? We shouldn't have to reference two different bugs to figure out what's going on.
First of all, what is the information you would like to put to either of the trackers?
One information which comes to my mind is that one might have doubts about applicability of the CVE to Fedora, right? But if the CVE is not applicable to Fedora, then it is possibly not applicable to RHEL. Or if this is not convincing, the you can s/Fedora/Linux/ and applicability to Linux vs e.g. Windows. So should such information be put into Fedora tracker or into the main tracker?
So what other information, which is really specific to Fedora should be put into Fedora tracker?
Vít
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
