> On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 2:01 PM Sandro <lists(a)penguinpee.nl> wrote: > > > pyproject does not work well, and is not backwards compatible. This is > particularly a problem for EPEL ports from Fedora. Personally, I'd > like to see it fixed for EPEL before relying on it for anything in > Fedora. The current py packaging guidelines recommend the opt-in dependency generator (which uses pyproject.toml) unless EPEL 8 or non-current Fedoras are used. Should this caveat be extended to F36 and EPEL 9, or am I mis-understanding the role of pyproject.toml for the packaging macros? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
