On Mon, 2022-09-05 at 22:45 -0400, Daniel Micay via devel wrote: > The comparison is being done incorrectly. Since hardened_malloc > builds > both a lightweight and heavyweight library by default, and since I > already explained this and that the lightweight library still has > optional security features enabled, it doesn't seem to have been done > in > good faith. My previous posts where I provided both concise and > detailed > information explaining differences and the approach were ignored. Why > is > that? I agree. I decided to do a more fair test myself (I'm quite interested in hardened_malloc). First, I downloaded the source RPM for my current kernel: dnf download --source kernel-5.19.6-200.fc36.x86_64 Then made both heavy and light variants: sysctl -p /etc/sysctl.d/hardened_malloc.conf make VARIANT=light Setup the chroot: mock -r fedora-36-x86_64 --init Create our SRPM: mock -r fedora-36-x86_64 --buildsrpm --spec kernel.spec --sources $PWD --resultdir $PWD Now do the compilations: cp out-light/libhardened_malloc.so . ./preload.sh /usr/bin/time mock -r fedora-36-x86_64 --rebuild kernel- 5.19.6-200.fc36.src.rpm >light.out 2>&1 /usr/bin/time mock -r fedora-36-x86_64 --rebuild kernel-5.19.6- 200.fc36.src.rpm >no_preload.out 2>&1 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
