Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for olem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 9/2/22 10:20, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> 
> Sep 2, 2022 5:36:41 AM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 
>> Does anybody know whether olem still wants to maintain their Fedora
>> packages?
> I'm fairly sure that they no longer wish to maintain Fedora packages. I 
> reached out to them about moby-engine and containerd at the end of May, 
> and they said they no longer have time to maintain them. I have been 
> maintaining those packages myself for a while.

Thank you for doing that. I wasn't aware olem was no longer active.

> 
> Side note: I have asked for co-maintainers for those packages a couple 
> times, but so far, I have not found any. Perhaps one of the CoreOS people 
> would be interested? It seems those packages are used a lot there based 
> on the bug reports we've gotten.

Interesting. I opened an issue for us to discuss: 
https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1291

Dusty
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux