>From my perspective, anything that blocks the release is on the critical path. So any time there's a violation of the release criteria and the package is not on the critical path definition, that's a bug in the definition. I recognize that this is a somewhat naïve view. For one, it may broaden the definition beyond the current capacity of our test infrastructure. It also may broaden the definition beyond what maintainers are willing to put up with. These are both legitimate problems. But the closer we can get to this ideal state, the better. For anyone who is curious, I just searched for all accepted blockers in the "Fedora" product in Bugzilla. 327 components have been a blocker at least once. Some of those may no longer be blocking and others will be added over time as our criteria change. The full list with counts is at https://bcotton.fedorapeople.org/release-blocking-components.csv if you're interested. -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
