Re: Thoughts welcome: interface between automated test gating and the "critical path"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 03:50:02PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
...snip...
> 
> I can think of I guess four options:
> 
> 1. Broaden the definition of the "critical path" somehow. We could just
> write in that it includes FreeIPA functionality, I guess, though that
> seems special purpose. We could broaden it to include any functionality
> covered by the release criteria, which would be quite a big increase
> but seems like a reasonable and concise definition. Or we could write
> in that it includes any functionality that is exercised by the gating
> openQA tests, though that seems a bit arbitrary - there's no
> particularly great organizing principle to the openQA tests we choose
> to run on updates, if I'm honest, it's a sort of grab bag I came up
> with.

I think this one is best... perhaps we could add something like 'and
such package groups as working groups decide are critical to their
edition' ?

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux