On Sat, 2022-08-27 at 01:44 +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Tomáš Popela wrote: > > This is an early heads-up about GTK 2 removal from RHEL 10+ (the > > gtk2 > > package was marked as unwanted in ELN with > > https://github.com/minimization/content-resolver-input/commit/b6d44e496f46bd2444e8e24dd3e9113b326817ac > > ). > > I suppose it could be carried in EPEL if needed. Or is somebody > attempting > to veto that too? > Finally I got this idea , we should have the *archived packages group*, that can be excluded from mass rebuild and gcc and python updates etc . The rest of the idea is instead force the retirement of the package we move it to the archive group , and by default archive group is not used , but if any one need a library to run an obsoleted applications he can . As Kevin Kofler (more or less) wrote in "Pcre Deprecation" thread, maybe we should be prepared to support pcre-1 forever and IMO we also can extend the concept to other packages, btw GTK2 is one of them . Checking on rawhide gtk2 still have 385 packages that depend on gtk2 ... -- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
