On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 4:32 PM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 4:28 PM Alexander Sosedkin <asosedkin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 4:18 PM Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Alexander, > > > > > > Would you mind to comment on your intentions with: > > > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/crypto-policies/c/2f33ffcfa7192037f969c6a28e092aca767a1415?branch=rawhide > > > > > > which just landed in Fedora and broke Ruby test suite (even more then it > > > was broken before): > > > > > > https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/ruby > > > > > > Although I know something like this was discussed and is already enabled > > > in c9s, > > > > Yes, it was: [2], [3] > > > > > I am not aware that the associated change [1] would be approved > > > nor that you would send a warning that this is going to happen. > > > > Wait, right. It was just the Forewarning1 [4] that was approved, > > not the Forewarning2 one. > > > > > Am I missing something? > > > > My intention was to break it right at the branch-off. > > What do I do now? Just keep it as it is? > > Revert, somehow initiate the approval early and unrevert once I have one? > > I don't think keeping rawhide/f38 intentionally broken, even if you're > going to revert the brokenness in f38 after it branches off, is ever a > good idea. > Please revert the change and wait for the devel list and FESCo > discussion of the topic before implementing it again. Ack, will do promptly. My bad. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
