Re: abipkgdiff - indirect sub-type changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Does this break ABI?

Yes. They changed functions to take 64-bit integers instead of 32-bit ones. 
When called by code compiled against a previous version, the upper half will 
be garbage. On some architectures (depending on how exactly arguments are 
passed, but they will usually be big-endian ones), even the whole thing. 
(There, the lower half will be complete garbage, and the upper half will be 
what should be the lower half. Or in the worst case, some architectures 
might even decide to switch from register to stack passing, making the whole 
number or even also the other arguments complete garbage.)

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux