Re: glibc 2.36 and DT_HASH (preserving it for F37+)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 10:31:03AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-08-22 at 08:43 +0200, Christoph Erhardt wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > On Sunday, 21 August 2022 17:29:56 CEST Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > I don't disagree that glibc should respect what distros set, I'm
> > > just
> > > asking us to build glibc with a DT_HASH table added until a formal
> > > deprecation/retirement cycle is done with all stakeholders aware of
> > > the change and everyone aware of the consequences of such a
> > > breakage.
> > +1. Deprecations of this sort should follow a proper process with
> > sufficient 
> > formal advance notice.
> 
> +1. Such breakage will just harm the reputation Linux (IMO).

A bit late to the game (I saw the email from Florian that an update
is being worked on), but +1 from me too.

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux