On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 08:51:12AM -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 11:24:10AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 11:38:26AM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > > I'd suggest doing a mock, copr or scratch build and running abipkgdiff > > > comparing current rawhide and the updated binary packages. It'll tell > > > you if there are any subtle ABI differences. > > > > Here's a scratch build: > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=91169327 > > > > The differences are: > > > > $ abipkgdiff liburing-2.0-4.fc37.x86_64.rpm liburing-2.2-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm --devel-pkg1 liburing-devel-2.0-4.fc37.x86_64.rpm --devel-pkg2 liburing-devel-2.2-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm --debug-info-pkg1 liburing-debuginfo-2.0-4.fc37.x86_64.rpm --debug-info-pkg2 liburing-debuginfo-2.2-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm > > The changes look good to me. Thanks for posting this information! It's building now: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=91172512 Note that I had to add the following to the spec file: BuildRequires: gcc-c++ Also (we were discussing in a different thread) liburing really needs a ./run script like we have in libvirt, libnbd etc. because configuring another project to use upstream liburing from source is a pain. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com nbdkit - Flexible, fast NBD server with plugins https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue